🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a bill raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," said the MEP behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some figures to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.